If you are a parent of anyone under the age of 17, then I am sure you know Hannah Montana. I will also bet that you saw that ridiculous picture of 15 year old, Miley Cryus, and know how this will effect her relationship with Disney.
To read article: Click HERE
The moms and dads of Wild WE are furious because of what this picture represents. Many of them feel that now they can no longer have their children watch Hannah Montana or Disney for that matter.
My question is, WHY do parents push to expliot their children? For the quick buck? I mean, really! What a way to destroy a household brand. What a way to take a child’s career and life and completely manipulate it to serve your own needs.
I know that Buzz Machine agrees with me. To read the post, Click HERE
It is our responsibility not only to representing our own brands in a way that we deem appropriate, but to also establish relationships with brands that we can trust.
I have a feeling A LOT of people will be boycotting Vanity Fair for this incident. Don’t you agree?
Love,
Ja-Nae
Your Wildly Brand Sensitive Leader
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
I disagree. I don’t think the pictures are pornographic or exploitive. They’re beautiful, somewhat moody and artful. Which in my mind captures the 15 year old internal experience… at least as I remember it. So for me, the only boycott should be with the media that has blown this out of proportion… and perhaps the parents that seemed “shocked” by it after the fact.